Sports coverage discussions including, BT, BBC, ITV and Sky Sports
guvnorgaz wrote on May 20 2006, 04:29 AM:
Facially shes fine but come on, body wise she is no Kirsty Gallacher, a long and baggy skirt and a flashers mack hides a multitude of sins, I have seen her without the big coat and she has no shape to her figure at all, its straight up and down, no curves, if you get what I mean. On SSN when you see head and shoulders only shes fine to look at, but the rest of her is very average I think, but each to their own hey?
Well, that's big of you. But as you say we've all got our own idea of what shape appeals. Personally, I think a girl who is 5' 9" and weighs approx. 7st.10.wringing wet and who, IMO has obviously resorted to silicon to help in the blouse department, isn't really so attractive. Oh, I forgot, she has a beautiful face so is your No.1.
guvnorgaz wrote:Dont see a need to
Nckb.49 This is a red letter day. He's actually lost for words. I've a question now. Is this the Kelly Dalglish Appreciation Thread or not? All you've done for what seems forever is slag off a lovely woman because she doesn't conform to your personal high standards. As you once said "to each his own". Then why don't you stop coming on this thread because those of us who do appreciate her are getting fed up with your nasty remarks.