RTS News channel of the year - Sky

Discussions on news and breaking news events including, BBC News, ITV News, Sky News
Post Reply
irxin
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 5:49 pm

Post by irxin » Sun Feb 24, 2008 12:55 pm

Well done again, no question that they are the best, and do not cost us one penny. I think they have won all except one since the catagory was introduced.



Very well done to Alex, so far ahead of that Beeboid woman in Packistan.



Also inovation with sky.com, again well deserved.

guvnorgaz
Posts: 984
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 7:30 pm

Post by guvnorgaz » Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:04 pm

They dont have much competition do they? Its a case of them being the best of a bad bunch

Watsuchiru
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:23 am

Post by Watsuchiru » Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:17 am

Very much deserved for Alex Crawford! Her reports have been on another level this year.



Never actually seen a full edition of Sky.com News...can't stand it! Suppose it is the most inovating news show of the last year - inovation isn't always a good thing, is it?



News channel of the year??? Hmmm...not so sure about that one! I think Al Jazeera English was also up in that category and they do tend to be better in my opinion...

Damian
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:34 pm

Post by Damian » Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:02 pm

irxin wrote:Well done again, no question that they are the best, and do not cost us one penny. I think they have won all except one since the catagory was introduced.





Sorry but thats gotta be the biggest joke ever.. there is no way in hell they deserved it this year... its such a hideous channel now... all of its bad.

sirius
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:33 pm

Post by sirius » Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:29 pm

Damian wrote: Sorry but thats gotta be the biggest joke ever.. there is no way in hell they deserved it this year... its such a hideous channel now... all of its bad.




I couldn't agree more. Sky News gets worse every year and is now completely unwatchable. Far too many banners, revolving squares and garish "breaking news" announcements. Take out the adverts and sport and you are left with almost no real news at all. The presenters are all second rate compared to other channels and most have their heads up their rear ends. it's hardly surprising that the channel's viewing figures have been in freefall these past two years.

guvnorgaz
Posts: 984
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 7:30 pm

Post by guvnorgaz » Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:14 am

Like today with those numpties on the roof at Westminster, 'I wonder who they are talking to on their phones?' asked Colin Brazier, well they are asking their mates how good they look on the news because they were giving them the exposure they wanted, if they had took them off air and they had got the reply 'I dunno mate, your not on TV' they would have been down faster than Jordans draws.



And what was happening with the business news today? Emma did the first report and then vanished for the rest of the day, wheres Michael Wilson and Shola whats her face? Sky were so busy reporting on teh tits on the roof they failed to notice 2 of their presenters have vanished

Post Reply